Browse By

Mills v. AAA Northern CA, NV and Utah Ins. Exch.

(California Court of Appeal) – In a suit against an insurance company that denied uninsured motorist coverage to a third party beneficiary injured in an automobile accident because it had cancelled the policy before the accident occurred, brought by the third party, the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer is affirmed over plaintiff’s contentions that: 1) the cancellation was invalid because a written notice seeking information sent by the insurer to the insureds prior to cancellation was unreasonable as a matter of law; and 2) disputed facts existed as to whether the insurer had mailed the notice of cancellation and actually cancelled the policy.

View Full Article on FindLaw
Charles Haley Jersey